There must be very clearly defined copyright laws concerning the playback of recorded works in film clips however (A) This wasn’t a soundtrack but a work in progress at the time, and therefore partially ‘live’ as well as recorded material that happened to be going on in the background (B) What was heard in the video is not necessarily what was included on the finished recording (C) The video was not monetised in any way.
Whether these points matter in legal terms hasn’t been pursued but it’s very unlikely that the music publishers would have had any real concerns about copyright but have no doubt been instructed to act by persons concerned with facilitating their personal need to control output, such is the way things are. It’s possible to get around it, and certainly possible to dispute it as it’s probably not a copyright issue, however as the film had already been widely circulated on YouTube and probably downloaded by those who know how, there’s little need to further tip anyone’s boat. It is sad that the other short film showing Holger at work, which was only uploaded as a sort of homage to him, was also disputed. Ironically, just about the only audio on that clip was my percussion performance, Holger’s ‘live’ guitar strums, ambient keys and a voice sample that was most likely lifted from an ethnic recording anyway. Even more curiously the entire album exists on YouTube without any concerns to anyone, which sort of speak volumes about this being someone’s determination to control the video output only, and is why I have chosen to leave both on Vimeo for now as silent pieces. I’m pleased if they can be appreciated as such regardless.
The response from the publishers read: Thank you for your email but I’m afraid I’m unable to correspond further on this matter as we consider it closed.
The Music Sales Group
This has been repeatedly asked over the years and now that there’s a chapter in a new biography referencing the event I’m sure people are reading and wondering again so, maybe I can put this one to bed.
Coming off stage a comment was made to me by another band member, delivered in the heat of the moment in a rather curt and rude fashion and incorporating the ‘f’ word if memory serves me correctly, in regards to the amount of time I would take to get from the kit to the front of stage to take the group bow. What wasn’t taken into consideration was that, as irritating as this might have been, it took time to get freed from wires (I was using a BPM machine via an ear piece) and various things needed doing in preparation for any further music that might be performed. Sometimes this would go smoothly but not always, either way I felt I was merely doing my job, one that I take quite seriously and feel is more important than taking timely bows or leisurely strolls. Much to my shame and regret I felt simultaneously very angry and very hungry and whilst helping myself to a slice of cheese with Mr. Barbieri standing dangerously close to me, I felt the mindless and irresistible urge (no doubt partially due to the fact that I’d been hammering drums for the past two hours) to slam down whatever I was holding in my left hand into the table with excessive force. Unfortunately for me, (and anyone with tickets for the next few shows) this was a rather large glass cheeseboard dome 😦
Time off for bad behaviour (think this is a selfie by Robby Aceto –pictured right).
Hi Craig. Annie invited me to listen to a new track she was working on at her home studio in her attic space which I believe wasn’t really set-up to record drums. She sang a guide vocal on it and we discussed what sort of thing was required. Since programming had become a fairly common practice by that time I took the track away and programmed something up in my own recording space. I actually used some of the same samples that I’d made for ‘Blackwater’, Rain Tree Crow, (which was also programmed, that’s another story). I think I drove my neighbours a bit nuts at the time as my place was being refurbished and there was no sound insulation. I had a few complaints. The track was called ‘Why’ and that explains why there are no drummers performing on it. I think the neighbours heard it a lot more after that.
It’s in straight 4/4 and the 1 is as ever on the 1, however the bass drum and snare emphasise the ‘and’ (8th notes) on 1 and 3, so you are probably slipping into perceiving the 1 on the ‘and’. There’s also a BD on the (6th) 16th beat which adds to the illusion of a triplet rhythm if you’re thinking that the Tom on the (3rd) 16th is the downbeat, which might confuse things further.
Yeah I know, none of that helps really … how about a diagram? Probably doesn’t either. I don’t know, it makes sense in my head but being self-taught doesn’t equip you with the appropriate tools for teaching. I’ll bet Gavin Harrison could elucidate this matter in no time 🙂
The short answer is that the half speed masters will preserve quality to the max and will be comparable to the actual master tapes, unlike the original vinyl which were far inferior but alas was the acceptable standard at the time. As a recording artist, listening to the vinyl was wholly depressing after hearing it ‘perfected’ in the studio. Half speed vinyl would have been a much more acceptable form of mass production.
The master tapes were not damaged or lost. However multi-track tapes were irreparably damaged, which means the music can not be remixed.
I would argue the buck stopped with manager Simon Napier-Bell, he was responsible for the characters he employed as PR agents. It’s fair to say that he was coming from a bygone era and it was time for a change but he wasn’t about to make it. I don’t think it could have been much more ludicrous than it was. Spinal Tap couldn’t do it justice. The idea that any press is good press was, in the innocence of the 70’s & 80’s, still a concept, and making the press listen seemed to be a measure of how good a flirt you could be. It appeared desperate, without any dignity and treating the public like morons. And it stained everything. A PR might argue that attaining press coverage is what made the group successful but that’s not the reality. No one holds onto sensationalist storylines for more than a few minutes of curiosity then it’s forgotten, or it becomes a token piece of worthless knowledge: “oh yeah isn’t that the guy that ….’ etc. and is most likely mocked. It does nothing to further a musical career. It’s short-sighted, like downing relentless tequila shots so you don’t sober up to realise everything’s shit. Keep creating a headline because no one’s actually buying the records, but maybe they will if there’s something … anything in the newspaper. Pour another tequila. That’s how the PR functioned. Must have been hard work but not at all representative of the essence of what the group hoped to achieve. Yes, we liked looking a certain way that might’ve warranted some attention by older generations but that’s just youth expresses itself. Our actual job was to focus on making music, and PR’s job was to make the public aware of it, but we were two completely different machines thrown together by default under the misguided concept that we were aiming towards the same goal but were in fact in different ballparks. Most of us made a speedy exit from that as soon as the band disbanded.
We just jammed until the songs sounded like something we might enjoy playing again. The aim I guess was to bridge the gap between the original and where we were heading.